SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHOMAN Noah | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
2 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
3 | PANDEY Neil | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
3 | MICLAUS Justin | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
5 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
6 | DENG Andrew | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
7 | LIU Lawrence | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
8 | LUTHRA Arjun | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
9 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 53% |
10 | GLOZMAN Justin | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
11 | OH Triton | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
12 | ZHU Shao | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
12 | SAVOY Luca | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
14 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 29% | |
15 | HOPPA Luke H. | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 38% | 11% | |
16 | KIM ELIJAH | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
17 | PAN Alex | - | - | 5% | 28% | 46% | 22% | |
18 | MARGULIES William | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
19 | LEE Andrew | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
20 | HUANG Tom | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% |
21 | POSY Daniel | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
21 | BELLA JARO Marcus Vincent | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
23 | BONDARENCO Vlad | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
24 | LIN Maxim | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
25 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
26 | VAROQUA Nalby | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
27 | SMINK Oliver | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
28 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
29 | TENG MATTHEW | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
30 | HAN Daniel Y. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% |
31 | RYAN Kai | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
32 | BADUSHOV Anton | 1% | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | |
33 | SAHAY Kenji | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
34 | DALAL Rohan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
35 | DOWNEY Baran | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
36 | DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
37 | KASPER Aaron | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 11% | |
38 | CHUNG Connor | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
39 | NGUYEN Anthony | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
40 | WEBER Mattias A. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
41 | KOGAN Nikita | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
42 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
43 | BERA Enzo | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
44 | STAMIS Kyle | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
45 | CHENG Hong | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
46 | BHATIA Ekam | 3% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
47 | ZHENG LEON | 1% | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
48 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
49 | KATZ Ryan | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
50 | LIN Philip T. | 1% | 17% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
50 | HUROWITZ Max | - | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
52 | ZHAO Lucas | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
53 | SUN Bill | 8% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
54 | LUCAS Hayden | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
55 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
56 | CHOKSI Vihaan | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
57 | ZHOU Grant | 2% | 13% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
57 | CHEN Samuel | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
59 | KILGALLEN William | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
60 | LIU Kevin | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
61 | ATWOOD Griffin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
62 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
63 | TANG Shu Hon | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
64 | LAUB William | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | DEKA Tanush | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
66 | ONG Chinli | 2% | 16% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
67 | LIN Steve | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
68 | WANG Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
69 | ZHAO ERIC | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
70 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
71 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
71 | WANG Weiyun | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
73 | MARGULIS Jared | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
74 | POLESHUCK KINEL Gil | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
75 | DELISSER Matthew | 21% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
76 | TSAO Oliver | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
77 | LIGUORI Michael | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
78 | JACQUES Hugo | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
79 | GOLDMAN Robert | 11% | 39% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
80 | MANESCU Miron | 33% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
81 | TAN Ethan | 19% | 45% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
82 | WAGNER Calvin | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
83 | GILPIN Samuel | 1% | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
84 | SIMATOS Luka D. | 25% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
85 | XU Justin | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
86 | LIN Justin | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
86 | IVRON Yonatan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
88 | SANDIN ROCHA PINTO LUCA | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
89 | CHANG ETHAN | 15% | 47% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
90 | KUMAR Arjun | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
91 | CORNAGIE Gehrig | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
92 | TSAO Alister | 37% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
93 | KAUFFMAN James | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
94 | MAMKIN Nathan | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
95 | SHELMIDINE Cole | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
95 | RAGAN STEINSSON Sigurdur | 24% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
97 | BAKER Sean | 12% | 50% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
97 | KUPER Tristan | 7% | 33% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
99 | LEDERMAN James | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
100 | SCHEINFELD Maximilian | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
101 | FERTIL Ethan | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
102 | BEEBY PIERRE Wyatt | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
103 | YUNG Matthew | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.