SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BERMAN Greta | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
| 2 | SHI Julia | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 49% | |
| 3 | TENG EMMA | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 5 | MALEK Zolie | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 6 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 7 | TA-ZHOU Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 8 | VINOKUR Anita | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 16% | |
| 9 | RANJAN Diya | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | LEOU Korina | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 11 | IANNUZZI Lucy | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 12 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 10% |
| 13 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 14 | LIANG Claire | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | KWON Ava | 10% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | LI Sonia | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | GUVEN Coco | - | - | - | 5% | 37% | 58% | |
| 18 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 19 | KWON Ava | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
| 20 | GENTILE Vittoria | 2% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 21 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | SOND Isha | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | FOSS Persephone | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 24 | JUILLERAT Elina | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | FUNG Iris | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 26 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
| 27 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 4% | |
| 28 | NIU Jessica | - | 6% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
| 29 | ALAMI Amira | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | CASTELO Soleil | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | STADNIK Emilia | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 32 | HU Anna | - | - | 2% | 19% | 56% | 23% | |
| 33 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 34 | LEIGH Adalene | 26% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | MANSPERGER Gia | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 36 | UEMOTO Lynn | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | LEE Kaelyn | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | WONG Charlene | 6% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | YU Helen | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
| 40 | RIFKIN Lielle | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | MERMEGAS Olivia | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
| 42 | BLUMBERG Harper | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | ZHANG Ashley | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 44 | BAIK Sarah | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LIM Alexa J. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 46 | KIM Audrey | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | PASUPULETI Laya | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 49 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | YAO Annabelle | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | BUTZ Angela | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 52 | CHERNY Sophia | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 53 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 54 | YEUNG Sidney | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | LEE Charlotte | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | ENG Madeleine | 9% | 33% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | FABRICANT Kioka R. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 58 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | HUANG Eleanor | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | KHERA Anya | 36% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 61 | BERNSTEIN Avery | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 62 | ZHAO Angie | 53% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 63 | YUN Madison | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | SONG Angelina | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.