University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | YANG Alisa | - | - | 2% | 27% | 48% | 23% |
2 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | 2% | 30% | 69% |
3 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
3 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
5 | LUO Ashley | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
6 | LU Samantha R. | - | 1% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 8% |
7 | SU Evelyn | - | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
8 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
9 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
10 | LIU Nicole | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
11 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | - | 2% | 28% | 48% | 22% |
12 | GORDET Cristina G. | - | 3% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 6% |
13 | MIINEA Elena | - | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - |
14 | HICKS Grace | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
15 | LEE Yedda | - | 5% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 3% |
16 | POLANICHKA Nicole | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
17 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
18 | TAPIA Sandy | - | - | 1% | 17% | 61% | 20% |
19 | BRISK Angelica A. | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
20 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
21 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 6% | 32% | 50% | 11% | - |
22 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | - | 2% | 26% | 48% | 24% |
23 | YOU Emily | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
24 | PEELER Julia | - | 4% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% |
25 | PLAZA-GASALLA Gloria | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
26 | ILLES Fanni | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
27 | BYRON Karen J. | - | 2% | 75% | 21% | 2% | - |
28 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
29 | GAVASHELI Margarita | 26% | 48% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
30 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
31 | QIU Emily | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
32 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
33 | SANFORD Kenyatta L. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
34 | MORET Brighid E. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
35 | ILYAS Ayah | 36% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
36 | MAGALSKI Mary | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
37 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | - | 16% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
38 | ALAWNEH Leen | 6% | 40% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
39 | ONO Melisa | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
40 | BOGDANOVSKAYA Elizaveta | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
41 | GARG Suhani | 52% | 47% | 1% | - | - | - |
42 | NOH Rachel | 35% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
43 | MURPHY Megan | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
44 | DOHERTY Eva | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
44 | ALAWNEH Lujain | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
44 | RITTER Brooklyn | 45% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
47 | LEVKOV Maita | 47% | 53% | 1% | - | - | - |
48 | GIFFORD Sally | 5% | 29% | 48% | 17% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.