Louisville, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TURNER Jackson | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | < 1% | |
2 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
3 | DEPP Edward | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 13% | 2% | < 1% |
3 | XING Samuel | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | < 1% | - |
5 | SMITH Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 52% | 5% |
6 | TRAN Emmanuel (Nino) | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
7 | GOMEZ Leo | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
8 | ALTENHOF Nathaniel | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
9 | GOODE Kaiden | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
10 | TRAN Emery | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
11 | RUEBY Max | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
12 | CHITWOOD Charles | 1% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
13 | BAUCHET Tao | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.