Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Friday, December 19, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2025 2316 - 1758
5 - 8 1692 1756 - 1640
9 - 16 1570 1910 - 1404
17 - 26 1282 1780 - 991

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 You, Asher Elite Fencing Academy U 2063 1781.19
2 Beletskii, Fedor Alliance Fencing Academy U 2316 1705.82
3 Fayez, Adam Elite Fencing Academy U 1963 1670.28
4 Thomson, Piers Alliance Fencing Academy U 1758 1466.73
5 Fu, Benjamin Yang Fencing Club U 1652 1389.90
6 Leung, Joon Maximum Fencing Club U 1640 1364.90
7 Jiang, Adam Elite Fencing Academy U 1756 1350.66
8 French, Luke Mustang Fencing Club U 1722 1299.72
9 Modi, Vihaan Alliance Fencing Academy U 1661 1222.80
10 Chi, Zachary Bida Fencing Academy U 1430 1148.33
11 Chen, Nathan Alliance Fencing Academy U 1759 1125.17
12 Lau, Jesse San Diego Fencing Center U 1416 1070.15
13 Xiong, Alec Alliance Fencing Academy U 1404 1054.94
14 Liu, Spencer Elite Fencing Academy U 1544 1035.53
15 Wang, Matthew Alliance Fencing Academy U 1910 967.48
16 Arulkumar, Rihaan Bida Fencing Academy U 1433 897.14
17 Van Riet, Matteo Alliance Fencing Academy U 1317 853.76
18 Sathyan, Dhruv Alliance Fencing Academy U 1273 842.74
19 Duchnowski, Kempson Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1285 837.19
20 hao, hardy Yang Fencing Club U 1088 703.06
21 Roche, Theodore Alliance Fencing Academy U 1423 647.64
22 Lin, Daniel Alliance Fencing Academy U 1780 644.23
23 Sadler, Leon Alliance Fencing Academy U 991 545.89
24 Yang, Clark Alliance Fencing Academy U 1081 365.52
25 Lin, Samuel Alliance Fencing Academy U 1405 243.32
26 Huffman, Shepherd Alliance Fencing Academy U 1173 52.31

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!