Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Friday, December 19, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2072 2564 - 1763
5 - 8 1613 1710 - 1425
9 - 16 1579 2114 - 1224
17 - 26 1273 1629 - 995

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Beletskii, Fedor Alliance Fencing Academy U 2564 1884.64
2 You, Asher Elite Fencing Academy U 2050 1750.66
3 Fayez, Adam Elite Fencing Academy U 1913 1604.35
4 Thomson, Piers Alliance Fencing Academy U 1763 1460.42
5 Fu, Benjamin Yang Fencing Club U 1661 1389.10
6 Leung, Joon Maximum Fencing Club U 1656 1359.22
7 Jiang, Adam Elite Fencing Academy U 1710 1203.30
8 Chi, Zachary Bida Fencing Academy U 1425 1134.59
9 Chen, Nathan Alliance Fencing Academy U 1833 1130.31
10 Xiong, Alec Alliance Fencing Academy U 1432 1077.63
11 Modi, Vihaan Alliance Fencing Academy U 1547 1076.87
12 Wang, Matthew Alliance Fencing Academy U 2114 1073.65
13 French, Luke Mustang Fencing Club U 1554 1061.55
14 Liu, Spencer Elite Fencing Academy U 1581 1007.12
15 Lau, Jesse San Diego Fencing Center U 1348 953.22
16 Sathyan, Dhruv Alliance Fencing Academy U 1224 753.83
17 Van Riet, Matteo Alliance Fencing Academy U 1271 691.19
18 Duchnowski, Kempson Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1224 629.01
19 Sadler, Leon Alliance Fencing Academy U 1089 577.99
20 hao, hardy Yang Fencing Club U 995 545.49
21 Roche, Theodore Alliance Fencing Academy U 1555 435.41
22 Yang, Clark Alliance Fencing Academy U 1155 394.71
23 Lin, Samuel Alliance Fencing Academy U 1539 265.95
24 Arulkumar, Rihaan Bida Fencing Academy U 1001 94.16
25 Huffman, Shepherd Alliance Fencing Academy U 1269 87.02
26 Lin, Daniel Alliance Fencing Academy U 1629 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!