Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Saturday, December 20, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2231 2385 - 2039
5 - 8 1764 1817 - 1702
9 - 16 1593 1678 - 1460
17 - 25 1174 1408 - 940

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 DeSeranno, Leander Renaissance Fencing Club C24 2385 2126.09
2 LIM, EUNSEONG Auburn Fencing Club C25 2320 2060.98
3 Lyu, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center E25 2180 1916.96
4 Qu, Zhida (richard) E25 2039 1785.77
5 Slain, Owen Silicon Valley Fencing Center E25 1817 1562.55
6 Jin, Xueyuan George Space City Fencing Academy E23 1816 1557.28
7 Yang, Luca Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1721 1458.29
8 Zhang, William Team Touche Fencing Center U 1702 1424.06
9 Alvarez, Francisco Janusz Maximum Fencing Club U 1678 1422.01
10 Murdock, Koichi Silicon Valley Fencing Center D25 1670 1400.33
11 tan, benjamin SoCAL Fencing Center U 1633 1364.29
12 Singh, Reyaansh Prime Fencing Academy U 1618 1278.93
13 Li, Lief Bida Fencing Academy U 1500 1223.03
14 Tan, Alan Austin Fencers Club U 1570 1194.94
15 Coran, Roland Renaissance Fencing Club U 1613 1189.19
16 Kutateladze, Danieli Epic Fencing Club U 1460 1098.99
17 Li, Mason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1329 1052.52
18 Sha, Laien SoCAL Fencing Center U 1408 1051.39
19 Meng, Andy Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1249 950.84
20 Teoh, Liam Austin Fencers Club U 1263 924.24
21 Rosowsky, Phoenix Space City Fencing Academy U 1288 905.39
22 Lin, Alex Space City Fencing Academy U 1042 522.58
23 Chang, Joshua Fencing Institute Of Texas U 940 491.25
24 Peck, Henrik Fencing Institute Of Texas U 1021 401.88
25 Jagannathan, Avi Renaissance Fencing Club U 1028 276.59

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!