SportsPlex At Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUGALA Hanna | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 2 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 29% | |
| 3 | MANKOVA Varvara | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 5 | ZENG Sarah | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
| 6 | FAVO Isabella | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% | |
| 7 | WANG yining | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 35% |
| 8 | ZHANG Sophie | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 9 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 10 | KANDADAI Lara | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 43% | 12% | |
| 11 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 44% | 14% | |
| 12 | CHOU Zoe | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
| 13 | NAYAK Esha | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 14 | NEUMAN Ella | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 3% | |
| 15 | CHI Claire | 2% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | KNOBEL Sophia | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 37% | 9% | |
| 18 | MYAT Chloe | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 10% | |
| 19 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 20 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% | |
| 21 | KAPLAN Gabriela | 3% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | HU Anna | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 23 | FREEMAN Armine | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | |
| 24 | RANJAN Diya | 2% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | BAINS Nandini | 3% | 22% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | KIM Audrey | 24% | 51% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 27 | FLATT Sophia | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
| 28 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | MARGULIAN Maria | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
| 30 | BAIREDDY Maya | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | AKULA Roszlynn | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | HO Sophia | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 33 | SHMULER Fiona | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | BARROSO Isabela | 2% | 17% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | NAYAK Antara | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | SVENSSON Siri Lin | 28% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | WONG Charlene | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | ONG Lauren | 14% | 49% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | PASUPULETI Laya | 47% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 4% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | YAO Annabelle | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | HARRISON Allie | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.