SportsPlex At Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DEPEW Spencer | - | - | 1% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 8% |
2 | NG Jeremiah | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
3 | EDELMAN Seth A. | - | - | - | 10% | 36% | 40% | 14% |
3 | COLE Alexander | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
5 | CHEONG Heonjun | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
6 | SHAHZAD Azlan A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
7 | DALAL Rohan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
8 | LUCAS Hayden | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
9 | GINSBERG Jordan | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
10 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
10 | CHUNG Connor | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
12 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
13 | KILGALLEN William | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
14 | NARANJO David E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
15 | CADAMBI Roshan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
15 | CHOKSI Vihaan | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
17 | HAN Daniel Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
18 | MEYERSON Jacob | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
19 | DIMATTEO Michael | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
20 | STAMIS Kyle | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
21 | BELLA JARO Marcus Vincent | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
22 | EYBELMAN Ariel | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
23 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
24 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
25 | BERA Enzo | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
26 | ZHAO Lucas | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
27 | PIWOWAR Alex | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
28 | DOWNEY Baran | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
29 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
30 | SAHAY Kenji | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
31 | KOGAN Nikita | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
32 | BHATIA Ekam | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
33 | DOLAN Charles R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
34 | BADUSHOV Anton | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
34 | NG Jonathan | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
36 | RYAN Kai | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
37 | HUROWITZ Max | - | - | 3% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 3% |
38 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
39 | WITCZAK Mateus | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
40 | GIZERSKY Jared | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
41 | KIM Theodore | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
42 | HOWE Brandon | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
43 | ONG Chinli | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | AHLMAN Jason | 14% | 48% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
45 | CUSUMANO Neal | 4% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
45 | KOMETANI TYLER | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | LIGUORI Michael | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
48 | BUCK Maximilian | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
49 | SINHA Ishaan | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
50 | LEDERMAN James | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
51 | TAUER Sam | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
52 | SHELMIDINE Cole | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
53 | RAGAN STEINSSON Sigurdur | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | PAYLAGO Cooper | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
55 | DESAUTELS Connor | 8% | 43% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
56 | ARORA Pranav | 9% | 43% | 43% | 5% | - | - | - |
57 | DEKA Tanush | < 1% | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
58 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
59 | KUPER Tristan | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
60 | SANDIN ROCHA PINTO LUCA | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
61 | BEEBY PIERRE Wyatt | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
61 | MAMKIN Nathan | 55% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
63 | SADHU Neiyam | 13% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.