Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 2 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 3 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 3 | SEIGEL Norah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 5 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
| 6 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 7 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 8 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 9 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 7% |
| 10 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 8% |
| 11 | YANG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 8% |
| 12 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 13 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 8% |
| 14 | GUAN Adeline | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 15 | PARK Leah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 16 | TORRES JIMENA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% |
| 17 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 18 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 22% |
| 19 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 20 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 21 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 22 | DO Leila | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 23 | KETTELLE Molly | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 24 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | OH Ceana | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 27 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 28 | HO Addison | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 5% | - |
| 29 | BRYZGALOVA Svitlana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 15% |
| 30 | WYNN Kylie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 31 | DESAI Esha | 100% | 82% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | - |
| 33 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 34 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 35 | KO Claire | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | YUEN Elsie | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | VANMOORSEL Faye | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CUI alivia | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Carol | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 43 | REN Kayley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 44 | GUO Audrey | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 46 | ESTRADA alondra maria | 100% | 98% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LEE Allison | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 48 | OTEYZA Camille | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 49 | CARVAJAL Sofia | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 50 | MCKAY Teresa | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | PU claire | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | FELDMAN Shanta | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BABB Cicely | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.