Fencing Center of Chicago RYC / RJC

Youth 14 Women’s Foil (Y14WF)

Sunday, December 7, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Canlan Sports - Libertyville - Libertyville, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1973 2210 - 1698
5 - 8 1579 1666 - 1499
9 - 16 1212 1465 - 935
17 - 25 1143 2500 - 587

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Horowitz, Shuli RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C25 2210 1958.32
2 Boike, Lucille Renaissance Fencing Club D25 2055 1800.09
3 Rivera, Leahy RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D25 1930 1678.07
4 Shusta, Lily Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club D25 1698 1421.66
5 Kim, Yuna Renaissance Fencing Club E25 1666 1388.20
6 Liu, Sophia RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1612 1333.34
7 Kashuba, Mila Eminence Fencing Academy E25 1539 1263.36
8 Koscik-Aquino, Emily Cleveland Fencing Academy - East E24 1499 1202.23
9 Savioz, Naomi Heartland Fencing Academy U 1385 1020.52
10 Chan, Chloe Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 1465 855.27
11 Xu, Teresa The Fencers Academy E25 1376 842.97
12 Bell, Blake Renaissance Fencing Club U 1210 825.67
13 Kagan, Natalie Eminence Fencing Academy U 1143 822.29
14 Edgar, Koko Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1179 503.79
15 Hewitt, Madison Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 935 425.28
16 Jiménez pelay, Claudia Renaissance Fencing Club U 1006 364.47
17 Wang, Sophia The Fencers Academy U 1208 334.60
18 Kumar, Leela Renaissance Fencing Club U 1273 305.90
19 Liu, Doris Eminence Fencing Academy U 956 233.29
20 Bader, Mia Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1439 156.53
21 Cho, Yuna Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 873 114.63
22 Marjamaa, Ada The Fencers Academy U 2500 < 0
23 Ku, Amanda Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 587 < 0
24 Huang, Charise Renaissance Fencing Club U 652 < 0
25 Ma, Sophie South Youth Fencing Alliance (SYFA) U 798 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!