Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% | |
| 2 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 3 | YAO Rainie | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 3 | WANG Gloria | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
| 5 | TSE Angelina | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% | |
| 6 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 54% |
| 7 | CHAN Jolene | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 8 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 9 | TAN Adelyn | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 10 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 11 | MANN Sophia J. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 12 | CHAVEZ Frine | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
| 13 | YAM Danika | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% | |
| 14 | LI YING CHU | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 15 | FENG Alicia G. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | DANG Kelia | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 14% | |
| 17 | WANG Peijia | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | CHEN Elaine | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 19 | GRULICH Rayaana | 1% | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 20 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | LIU Sydney | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 22 | LO Chloe | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | WANG Zidan | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 24 | BROWNER June | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 25 | WANG Jiayi | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CHO Michelle | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 27 | BORDAS HILL Georgiana | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 7% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | VANKIRK Avery | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 30 | LEE Irene | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | LIN Annika | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | TURIANO Nadelle | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | STONE Coral | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 12% | |
| 34 | XA-CHIN Sara | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | LIN Kyleen | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
| 36 | LIN Abbey | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | MUNGUIA Mila | 9% | 40% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | HAN Emma | 24% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | KINKADE Ellie | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 40 | LIU Hannah | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | ZHENG sophie | 7% | 34% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | LI Esther | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | KNULL Emma | 32% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | AMELANG Raquel | 42% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.