Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ISAACSON Bjorn | V V V V V | V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | SHEYNKMAN Leon | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 5 | DYER John G. | V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 6 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 7 | PRICE Owen | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | LEWIS River | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 9 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | D V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 10 | HAHM Samuel | V V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | D V V V D | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 12 | MAGGY Melanie D. | V D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 13 | ZIMSKY James | D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 14 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 15 | ROUNTREE Andrew | D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 16 | HARPER Wesley | D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 17 | POOLE Katherine | V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 18 | BIELEWICZ Nicholas | V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 19 | THOMAS Ryan | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 20 | SMITH IV Ted A. | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 21 | TETTERTON Jr Joseph S. | D V D D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
| 22 | SHEA Aleksander | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 23 | SINGH Meet | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 24 | LAMBERT Luke | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 25 | NANAYAKKARA Sanuthi | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.