Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MARRAN Erik R. | V V D V V | V V V V | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 2 | HAN Lawrence | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | UPSHAW Micah | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | CHEN Leonardo | D D V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 5 | SHULKIN Mark | V V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 6 | LEVCHOOK Thomas | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 7 | GILLER Augustus | V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | FUSSMAN Yuval | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 9 | CORRIDON Jack T. | V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 10 | STAUDINGER Enzo | D V V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 11 | CZEPLA Andrew | D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 12 | WEN Ethan | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 13 | RITTMAN Zacc | V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 14 | HIGGASON Hugh | D V D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 15 | ZENG Andrew | D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 16 | KIRSCH Adam J. | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 17 | KENNEN Liam | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 18 | OBER James | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.