Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TIEU May L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
2 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
3 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
3 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 3% |
5 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
6 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
7 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
8 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
9 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
10 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
11 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
12 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
13 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
14 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
15 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
16 | TOLBERT Zoe | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
17 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
18 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% | |
19 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
20 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
21 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
22 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
23 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
24 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
25 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
26 | BOODELL Ella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
27 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | XU Madison | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
29 | BECKER Elena | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
31 | NARANG Maya | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
32 | SEGAL Lydia G. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
33 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
34 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
35 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
36 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
37 | LOW Sharon J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
38 | PAGES Melanie | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
39 | SU Michelle | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
40 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
41 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
42 | DU Hannah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
43 | MOY Kayla A. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
44 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
45 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
46 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
47 | KHROL Galyna | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
48 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
49 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
50 | SOLSKY Brooke A. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
51 | RUSK Lauren G. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
52 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
53 | PO Edith | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
54 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
55 | TANG Ai Jia | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
56 | FU Qihan | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
57 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 65% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
58 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
59 | JULIUS Sonia | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
60 | CHEN Yichun | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
61 | LAM Victoria M. | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.