Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 2 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 51% | 10% |
| 3 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 3 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 5 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | - | - | 8% | 40% | 52% |
| 6 | HILADO Sarah | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 7 | GHOSH Priyanka | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 8 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 3% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 9 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% | |
| 10 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 11 | VALADEZ Emily T. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 12 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 13 | MACE Eliza M. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 27% | 4% |
| 14 | KATZ Anat | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% | |
| 15 | SAYLES Nina R. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | FEIGELES Carolyn A. | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 17 | POKRIFKA Gwenore F. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | GARIBIAN Emma E. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | FORCELLATI Meghan R. | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | WAGNER Madelyn G. | 16% | 44% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | KOO Samantha | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 22 | YANG Kaitlyn H. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 23 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 24 | WEBER Juliana I. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 25 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 26 | YURT Leyla | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | O'HARA Eimile J. | 2% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 28 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | 12% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | DANIELS Erica | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | WHEELER Kira | 46% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.