RYC/RJC of the Rockies Fall

Youth 14 Women’s Foil (Y14WF)

Sunday, November 9, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Register

Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1894 2213 - 1744
5 - 8 1580 1696 - 1438
9 - 16 1276 1581 - 1128
17 - 25 1288 2580 - 679

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Chan, Mila Massialas Foundation (M Team) C25 2213 1954.37
2 Han, Gian Team Touche Fencing Center D25 1818 1562.82
3 Chan, Ella Massialas Foundation (M Team) C25 1802 1534.25
4 Hom, Avery Massialas Foundation (M Team) D25 1744 1473.98
5 Deng, Claire Team Touche Fencing Center E25 1696 1438.47
6 Fan, Sophia Golubitsky Fencing Center D25 1670 1396.56
7 Lee, Abigail Maximum Fencing Club E25 1517 1243.24
8 Kim, Ines Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1438 1142.28
9 Hom, Emma Massialas Foundation (M Team) D25 1279 981.31
10 Mclanahan, Jasmine Massialas Foundation (M Team) E25 1274 953.45
11 Fan, Lauren Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1196 846.32
12 Liu, Celia LA International Fencing U 1128 840.99
13 Dillon, Zoe Roaring Fork Fencers Club U 1418 786.67
14 Lavery, Lucy Prime Fencing Academy U 1581 771.07
15 Poei, Meagan Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1142 690.03
16 Lee, Lauren Jinju South Denver Fencing Academy U 1194 682.05
17 Dvoiris, Maya Piedmont Fencing Team U 1016 554.86
18 Tang, Clementine Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 732 305.49
19 Cole, Emma South Denver Fencing Academy U 2580 232.84
20 Schwabauer, Emilia South Denver Fencing Academy U 944 121.81
21 Cho, Rylee Team Touche Fencing Center U 679 108.92
22 Oh, Amber Elite International Fencers Club U 1070 107.64
23 Moon, Vivian South Denver Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
24 Huang, Veronica Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 1267 < 0
25 Shipman, Danika South Denver Fencing Academy U 802 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!