Mary Rafanelli RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

Saturday, January 17, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Pasadena Convention Center - Main Ballroom - Pasadena, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2342 2552 - 2198
5 - 8 2155 2175 - 2134
9 - 16 2054 2139 - 1952
17 - 32 1823 2162 - 1674
33 - 56 1319 1901 - 559

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lozano, Veyron Jericho LA International Fencing B25 2552 2291.79
2 Wong, Evan Prime Fencing Academy B25 2345 2091.23
3 Bieler, Mason LA International Fencing B25 2274 2022.98
4 Park, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center D25 2198 1944.39
5 Li, Lucas LA International Fencing C25 2175 1920.38
6 Choi, Ethan Precision Athletics Fencing Club C25 2160 1905.70
7 Chang, Eric Jonathan Orange County International Fencers Club D25 2150 1898.85
8 Chang, Jeremy Orange County International Fencers Club D25 2134 1884.58
9 Borg, Matthew Team Touche Fencing Center C25 2139 1881.64
10 Ong, Nicholas Elite International Fencers Club C25 2132 1879.25
11 Park, William Massialas Foundation (M Team) D25 2133 1874.94
12 Lee, Abin LA International Fencing C25 2122 1866.64
13 Wei, Winston Massialas Foundation (M Team) D25 2007 1752.82
14 Yang, Tate Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1978 1709.30
15 YE, Jerry Orange County International Fencers Club E24 1952 1697.20
16 Deng, David Team Touche Fencing Center E25 1967 1692.15
17 Tsoi, Spencer Precision Athletics Fencing Club C24 1924 1646.69
18 wang, sicheng Golubitsky Fencing Center E25 1898 1629.97
19 Zhan, Kevin Golubitsky Fencing Center D25 1871 1597.27
20 Xu, Ethan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1848 1585.59
21 Guo, Austin LA International Fencing E25 1849 1572.31
22 Choi, Colin Precision Athletics Fencing Club D25 2162 1567.94
23 Hong, Edwin Golubitsky Fencing Center E25 1825 1567.01
24 Tang, Brayden Golubitsky Fencing Center E25 1867 1539.14
25 Huang, Nathan SoCAL Fencing Center D25 1791 1530.04
26 Gudimetla, Siddhanth Team Touche Fencing Center E25 1809 1528.71
27 Zhang, Yankai LA International Fencing U 1769 1499.08
28 Foy, Grant Elite Fencing Club D25 1765 1486.81
29 Murdock, Koichi Silicon Valley Fencing Center D25 1710 1444.98
30 Zhang, Andrew Bay Area Fencing Club E25 1693 1405.21
31 Bhanot, Arjun Bay Area Fencing Club E25 1674 1379.24
32 Young, Luke LA International Fencing E25 1716 1305.63
33 Oh, Kepler Maximum Fencing Club U 1692 1253.09
34 Lee, Christopher Elite International Fencers Club D25 1550 1244.04
35 Karpman, Benny LA International Fencing E25 1585 1229.45
36 Blunck, Kristof Golubitsky Fencing Center E25 1901 1200.07
37 Pontoppidan, Erik Elite Fencing Club D25 1511 1169.81
38 Yung, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1477 1118.46
39 Leong, Wilson Hua Golden State Fencing Academy E25 1439 1101.09
40 Yoo, Christian Team Touche Fencing Center U 1541 1089.71
41 Trujillo, Jonah United Fencing Academy E25 1424 1074.64
42 Kwong, Colin LA International Fencing U 1315 1002.85
43 Brady, Benjamin E25 1513 988.42
44 Dacko, Nolan LA International Fencing E25 1330 897.67
45 Williams, Matthew Prime Fencing Academy E25 1333 885.80
46 Lee, Lucas LA International Fencing U 1553 850.17
47 Tejakusuma, Eric SoCAL Fencing Center U 1160 717.47
48 Washburn, Cooper Universal Swords and Fitness U 1824 711.55
49 Shadravan, Arash LA International Fencing U 1212 666.97
50 Nguyen, Nolan Maximum Fencing Club U 740 266.36
51 Tsai, Spencer Piedmont Fencing Team U 1318 142.72
52 Picache, Crockett Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 978 99.92
53 Le, Oliver Piedmont Fencing Team U 747 24.08
54 Koehler, Marc South Coast Fencing Center U 896 16.00
55 Schamp, Eliot Piedmont Fencing Team U 559 < 0
56 Lintner-Calvo, Julien Piedmont Fencing Team U 1056 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!