Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 2 | CHUNG Kimberly L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 3 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% |
| 3 | HARRISON Amelia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | |
| 5 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 6 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 7 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
| 8 | XU Celina | 100% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 9 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 10 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 11 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 12 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 92% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 15 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
| 16 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 17 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 18 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 19 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 20 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 21 | BEAMS Alyona | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 22 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 25 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | BROWN Riley | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | BARON Sabina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 29 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | |
| 30 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
| 31 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | |
| 34 | POON Desiree | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | RYAN Minhuey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 37 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 38 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 39 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 40 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 41 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | MA Katelyn | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 45 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 47 | OSTRIKOFF Michelle | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | DENG Annie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | DAYAL Saahira | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | BARNEY Lindsey | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | CHAN Allison M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.