Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 2 | BARRETO Elliott | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 3 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 3 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 5 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 12% |
| 6 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | |
| 7 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 8 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
| 9 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 10 | COOK Cole | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
| 11 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 12 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 13 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 14 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
| 15 | ZHOU James Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 1% | |
| 16 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 17 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | |
| 18 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 19 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 20 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 7% | |
| 21 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 22 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 23 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 24 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 25 | PASTORE LIU Vince | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | |
| 26 | SOWERS Samuel | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 27 | BOWEI Yang | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 30 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | BULLARD Bennett | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 18% |
| 33 | ZHOU William | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | YANG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 36 | BYON Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
| 37 | LEIGH Edward | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | KIM Evan | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 40 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 41 | FERGUSON Constantine | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 42 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | SUNG Julian | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | SHAO Yue | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 46 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | CHEN Zejia E. | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | HO Anson | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | ROSALES Vincent | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | FOX Gavin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% | 1% |
| 51 | NIETO Titus P. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 52 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | ROSS Dash S. | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | TSAI Michael T. | 100% | 86% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.