Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 2 | AYALA Carlos | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
| 3 | COVINGTON Max G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 3 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% | |
| 5 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 6 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 7 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
| 8 | YAN Kevin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 19% |
| 10 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 11 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | |
| 12 | HUNTER-DORADEA Ernest | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 14 | SUORSA Markus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 15 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 16 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 17 | BYON Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 10% |
| 18 | YANG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 19 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 20 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
| 21 | NIETO Titus P. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 22 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 2% | |
| 23 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 24 | MARQUEZ Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 25 | ODURO Jesse | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 26 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 27 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 28 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | HO Anson | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | ZHOU William | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | KIM Evan | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | FOX Gavin | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | LEE Noah | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 35 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 26% |
| 36 | TSAI Michael T. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | HERRERA aragon | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | FAYETTE Julien | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | GARDNER David | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | ZHONG Xuan | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | STONE Brad | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | PASTORE LIU Vince | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | YU Casey | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | CAISSE Michael J. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | ZHOU James Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 49 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | ZOLLER Matthew | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 51 | WRIGHT Lloyd G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 52 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 55 | FERGUSON Constantine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 56 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 57 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | SANDERS David | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.