Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
2 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
3 | KENT Elizabeth J. | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
3 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
5 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% |
6 | WANG Zoe | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
7 | LIANG Jingjing | 2% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
8 | WANG Victoria | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
9 | PHUKAN Indra | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
10 | SHELIN Chelsea | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
11 | CARRIER Meredith | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
12 | BARBARA Camille | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
13 | LIU Baihan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
14 | BARON Sabina | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
15 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
16 | XU Celina | 9% | 40% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
17 | YAO Yilin | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
18 | CHANG Abigail | 4% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | |
19 | WANG Jessie | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
20 | GULLY Wren | - | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
21 | WANG Angelina | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
22 | ENRILE Erica | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
23 | CHANG Celine A. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
24 | KIM Jayna | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
25 | LAI Amanda | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
26 | LIN Ariel | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
27 | LEWIS Rachel | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
28 | DAYAL Saahira | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
29 | HAU Olivia | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
30 | MOLLINIER Angel | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
31 | DENG Annie | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
32 | BLANCO Ariia | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
33 | BEAMS Alyona | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
34 | POON Desiree | 2% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
35 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
36 | HASIM Eurietta | 7% | 31% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
37 | MA Katelyn | 2% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
38 | GAN Shelby | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
39 | SALISTRA Emilia | 1% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
40 | LEE Yeriel | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
41 | MENDOZA zoie | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
42 | SCHMELZER Elizabeth | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
43 | MAGYARI-KOPE Ingrid | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | |
44 | CHENG Liwen | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
45 | JAMES Ashley | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
46 | CHENG Yiwen | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.