Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 2 | KOROL Neta | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 35% | |
| 3 | CHO Cameron S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
| 3 | LI Shuang | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 40% | 6% |
| 5 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 6 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
| 7 | PENG Amber L. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
| 8 | LAI Sophia | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 9 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
| 10 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | KIM Rachel | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | |
| 12 | FUNG Emma | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 13 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | SEIGEL Norah | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% | |
| 15 | DO Leila | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | KOROL Dana | - | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% |
| 17 | FUNG Vera | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
| 18 | OH Ceana | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% | - |
| 19 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 20 | MU Allison | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 21 | YANG Audrey | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 22 | WELBORN Calissa | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 23 | LUH Mia P. | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | HOBSON Ava | - | 3% | 33% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 25 | RAO Sonia D. | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | MORALES Paulina | 1% | 15% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
| 28 | PENG Charlotte | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 30 | KO Claire | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | MING YUE | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | PATTERSON Natalia | 28% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | YAN Noelle | 4% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | WANG Celine S. | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | PENG Serena | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | KETTELLE Molly | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | GOEL Riyana | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | LIU Jessica | 51% | 46% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | SEN Arjen | 9% | 45% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | JANEW Anastasia | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | FONG Ellis | 41% | 54% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | ZHENG Zoe | 38% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | DAMJI Alia | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.