Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
2 | CHOY LeeAnn | - | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 31% | |
3 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
3 | WU Fan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% |
5 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% |
6 | LUO Ashley | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
7 | YAMANAKA Mina | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% | |
8 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
9 | KHARCHYNA Polina | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
10 | CAFASSO Natalya | 10% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
11 | WONG Alexandra R. | 1% | 10% | 38% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
12 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
13 | REID Anousheh | - | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
14 | LU Junyao | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
15 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
16 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 32% | |
17 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
18 | SHU Youshan | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
19 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
20 | YANG Alisa | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
21 | SU Evelyn | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
22 | HONG Elaine | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
23 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
24 | CHEN Jingyun | - | 12% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
25 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
26 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
27 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 2% | |
28 | CANNING Charlotte | - | 7% | 34% | 42% | 15% | 2% | |
29 | TRAN Helena | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
30 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
31 | MISHIMA Audrey | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
32 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - | |
33 | QI Jarynne Valerie | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
34 | FURMAN Maria | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
35 | LIN Elaine | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
36 | AI Amy | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
37 | WANG Yumin | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% | |
38 | LI Fei | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
39 | LIU Nicole | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
40 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
41 | LEE Claire | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
42 | WITTE Vera | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
42 | UNGURIANU Nika | 6% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
44 | MEYER Rachel | 39% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
45 | KUDIEROVA Anastasiia | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
46 | HOPKINS Leila | 2% | 16% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
47 | FENG ge | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
48 | ELKHATEEB Fajr | 21% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
49 | CHANG Chloe | 15% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
50 | XIE Fiona | 28% | 48% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
51 | SHAKIR Inaaya | 7% | 49% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
52 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 46% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
53 | LI Alisha | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
54 | ZHANG ANGELA | 33% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
55 | KWOK Tianna W. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
56 | YANG Charlotte | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
57 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
58 | TONG Lauren | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
59 | HILLYER Megan | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
60 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 18% | 48% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
60 | MCGEE Sophia | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
62 | SINHA Zara | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
63 | ZHENG Linden | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
63 | MEYER Rebecca | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
65 | HU Chloe | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
66 | LIN Victoria T. | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
67 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 41% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.