Neil Lazar RYC/RJCC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Sunday, April 5, 2026 at 3:00 PM

Register

Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1640 1860 - 1560
5 - 8 1488 1578 - 1337
9 - 16 1406 1570 - 1247
17 - 28 1484 2500 - 997

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 LIU, FREDERICK Medeo Fencing Club U 1860 1550.24
2 Luo, Sebastian Wanglei International Fencing Club U 1560 1263.56
3 Ivanov, Andrew Medeo Fencing Club U 1560 1258.79
4 Yin, Xiangheng Cavalier Fencing Club U 1582 1245.24
5 Li, Sean Olympia Fencing Center U 1578 1231.47
6 Cavallaro, Xavier Shoreline Fencers Club U 1524 1166.38
7 Cheung, Daniel New York Fencing Academy U 1515 1137.71
8 Shabbir, Mohammad Amaan Ultimate Fencing Academy U 1337 1029.45
9 Shyu, Brady Vivo Fencing Club U 1570 980.21
10 Saliba, Jackson New York Fencing Academy U 1348 977.10
11 Lu, Shawn New York Fencing Academy U 1460 945.97
12 Tang, David Wanglei International Fencing Club U 1401 894.12
13 Ko, Caden North Shore Fencers Club U 1462 884.51
14 Yong, Dylan Olympia Fencing Center U 1388 871.55
15 Law, Benjamin Arena Fencing Academy LLC U 1247 857.37
16 Ainsworth, Rhys Olympia Fencing Center U 1374 827.59
17 Xie, Frank Olympia Fencing Center U 1465 796.21
18 Bacon, Bryce Olympia Fencing Center U 1013 528.44
19 Sala, John Shoreline Fencers Club U 1234 499.14
20 Aden, Xiyan Rogue Fencing Academy U 1464 449.14
21 Chen, Bao Olympia Fencing Center U 997 390.44
22 Amlot, Noah Olympia Fencing Center U 1237 195.66
23 Penterman, Thomas LEO Fencing Club U 1809 123.24
24 Park, Teo Shoreline Fencers Club U 2500 < 0
25 Zhuta, Daniel Rogue Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
26 Jeong, Joshua New Jersey Fencing Alliance U 1192 < 0
27 Bonthapally, Nirvaan Olympia Fencing Center U 1249 < 0
28 Lee, Kyubin Olympia Fencing Center U 1146 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!