Neil Lazar RYC/RJCC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Sunday, April 5, 2026 at 2:00 PM

Register

Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1626 1792 - 1554
5 - 8 1508 1546 - 1464
9 - 16 1358 1453 - 1220
17 - 28 1413 2500 - 947

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 LIU, FREDERICK Medeo Fencing Club U 1792 1490.77
2 Ivanov, Andrew Medeo Fencing Club U 1575 1283.07
3 Luo, Sebastian Wanglei International Fencing Club U 1554 1259.86
4 Yin, Xiangheng Cavalier Fencing Club U 1584 1252.74
5 Li, Sean Olympia Fencing Center U 1546 1210.71
6 Yan, Milan Cavalier Fencing Club U 1464 1177.88
7 Cavallaro, Xavier Shoreline Fencers Club U 1524 1166.38
8 Cheung, Daniel New York Fencing Academy U 1500 1131.48
9 Shabbir, Mohammad Amaan Ultimate Fencing Academy U 1306 1002.44
10 Yong, Dylan Olympia Fencing Center U 1437 981.43
11 Lu, Shawn New York Fencing Academy U 1396 940.71
12 Saliba, Jackson New York Fencing Academy U 1299 938.74
13 Tang, David Wanglei International Fencing Club U 1381 882.48
14 Law, Benjamin Arena Fencing Academy LLC U 1220 844.93
15 Ainsworth, Rhys Olympia Fencing Center U 1374 827.59
16 Xie, Frank Olympia Fencing Center U 1453 817.32
17 Bacon, Bryce Olympia Fencing Center U 1080 631.88
18 Sala, John Shoreline Fencers Club U 1188 478.65
19 Aden, Xiyan Rogue Fencing Academy U 1464 449.14
20 Penterman, Thomas LEO Fencing Club U 1965 448.22
21 Barbier, Benjamin Olympia Fencing Center U 1197 409.98
22 Chen, Bao Olympia Fencing Center U 997 390.44
23 Bonthapally, Nirvaan Olympia Fencing Center U 1529 303.41
24 Park, Teo Shoreline Fencers Club U 1718 182.70
25 Amlot, Noah Olympia Fencing Center U 1177 174.49
26 Zhuta, Daniel Rogue Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
27 Jeong, Joshua New Jersey Fencing Alliance U 1192 < 0
28 Lee, Kyubin Olympia Fencing Center U 947 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!