Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHAMBERS Miles | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | DOMINIQUE Remson | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | ONG Dylan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 3 | KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 5 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | SALDARINI Glenn | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | SASSI Ilyas | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 8 | KHANNA Adamantis | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 9 | SHAPIRO Simon | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | VIDREVICH David | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | LAMTAN Christoffer | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | WANG tiger | V V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 13 | STEVENS Flynn | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 14 | TAYCHER Aaron | V V V D D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | LEE Damian | D D V V V | V V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 16 | PEACE Samuel | V D D D D | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 17 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | V D V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 18 | CHANG Timothy | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 19 | HOWARTH Hayes | V D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 20 | SONG Aidan | V V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 21 | CHAVAN Aditya | V D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 22 | CRAWFORD William | D V V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 23 | MARSHQUIST Miles | V V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 24 | FOSTER Trevor | D V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 25 | MHLEY Gavin | V V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | KOREN George | V D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 27 | LAU Kyrus | V D V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 28 | MIAO Heqi | D V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 29 | SHINCHUK Jacob | D V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | LIU Eric | D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 31 | SINGH Sumair | D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 32 | CAREY Sam | D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 33 | LEVIN Jacob | V V V D V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 34 | RODRIGUEZ GALVAN Andres | V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 35 | ARVIND Adhijay | D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 36 | CUSSON William | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 37 | MALEK Zak | V D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 38 | GRIGORYAN Sevak | D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 39 | CAI Lin Rui | V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 40 | SAUVE Quinn | D V D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 41 | EARLEY Jack | D D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 42 | RABEL Alexander | V D V D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 43 | LEIGH Brayden | D V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 44 | RABEL Sebastian | D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 45 | MENZIES Liam | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 46 | BURENKOV Matthew | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 47 | SHALISH Milan | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 48 | CHAN Ewan | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 48 | GAYTAN Antonio | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 50 | WANG William | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 51 | HORJUS Daniel | D D V D D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 52 | DANIELS William | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 53 | KARAVAS Nicholas | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 54 | DATTILIO Aidan | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 55 | HILL Robbie | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 56 | KOREN David | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 57 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.