Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WU Amelia | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 49% | |
| 2 | DANIEL Olivia | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 3 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 3 | GAURIAT Jade S. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 5 | KIM Zoe L. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 6 | LABRACHE Ella P. | 1% | 13% | 42% | 38% | 7% | |
| 7 | DU Angela | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 8 | LO Sabrina S. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 9 | SINHA Zara | 13% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 10 | FENG Elaine | 1% | 24% | 47% | 25% | 4% | |
| 11 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | YPHANTIDES Anthi | 2% | 27% | 44% | 23% | 3% | |
| 13 | BRYANT Michelle | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | |
| 15 | BROWNE Zoe | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 16 | QURESHI Nisa | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.