UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ELSTON Sophia | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
2 | FRANGER Macy | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
3 | SU Evelyn | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
3 | MARTINEZ Christina | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
5 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
6 | BO GENESIS | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
7 | HAYNES Antonia | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
8 | READ Lyla | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
9 | NIX Reagan | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
10 | NGUYEN Ella | 4% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | - |
11 | DAVIS Jennifer | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
12 | IYER Ishana | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
13 | SCHMITT Harper | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
14 | FAN Elizabeth | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
15 | NELSON Grace E. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
16 | FANG jenna kim | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
17 | TAM Connie | 10% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
18 | NATESAN Nithya | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
19 | SUN Zeyu | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
20 | FANG Jocelyn | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
21 | CHUANG Ramona | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
22 | LISCUM Vivian | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
23 | CHANG Abigail | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
24 | CHAN Macie | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.