UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% |
2 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 45% | 46% | |
3 | REEVES Liam | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
3 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
5 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
6 | XIE Buster | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
7 | TSAO Lukas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 45% | 20% |
8 | GUTH Joseph | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
9 | MCISAAC Finn | - | - | 2% | 17% | 52% | 30% | |
10 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
11 | RAJ Jay | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
12 | VOLLMER Quintin | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
13 | LIU Jinning | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
14 | STRINGER David | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
15 | OROPEZA David | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
16 | EDWARDS Maxon | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 40% | 9% |
17 | HUANG Chenghan | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
18 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% | 1% |
19 | CHUANG Oscar | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
20 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 1% | 10% | 35% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
21 | DUNLAP Ian | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
22 | XU Ethan | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
23 | BERNARD Cohen | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
24 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
25 | ZHANG Lucas | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
26 | CHOI Benjamin | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | KUE Temujin | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
28 | SLUSHER Gideon | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
29 | TOWNE Benjamin | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
30 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
31 | VANOYEN Dominick | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
32 | REAUME Nate | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
33 | LIU Yinhong | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
34 | COPELAND Nigel | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
35 | PARKER Isaiah | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
36 | NAZARIO Dominic | 6% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 2% | - | |
37 | HERRERA Xavier | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
38 | MODADUGU Aryan | 10% | 40% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | |
39 | DHOKTE Neev | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
40 | MARISI Gabriel | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
41 | MAVANI Krishna | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
42 | KIM Daniel | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
43 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
44 | CHOI Inho | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | ZMUDA Aiden | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
46 | LAMBERT Parker | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
47 | MICK Gabriel | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.