2nd Annual BBFC RYC and Y8

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Saturday, December 13, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1744 1911 - 1633
5 - 8 1506 1610 - 1411
9 - 16 1170 1454 - 844
17 - 27 824 1341 - 531

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Jin, Yucheng LA International Fencing U 1911 1559.36
2 Cremel, Remi Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1740 1470.65
3 Lin, Sampson SoCAL Fencing Center U 1690 1400.44
4 tan, benjamin SoCAL Fencing Center U 1633 1364.29
5 Singh, Reyaansh Prime Fencing Academy U 1610 1279.32
6 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1531 1244.16
7 Li, Lief Maximum Fencing Club U 1473 1198.63
8 Kajita, Grayson Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1411 1137.33
9 Sha, Laien SoCAL Fencing Center U 1454 1118.17
10 Jue, Lucas Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1421 1111.95
11 Li, Mason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1312 1040.56
12 Lin, Stewart Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1303 960.79
13 Wu, Kangdi LA International Fencing U 1014 527.39
14 Chang, George Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1056 406.53
15 Cremel, Louis Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 844 383.31
16 Wang, Andy Golubitsky Fencing Center U 954 368.41
17 Chen, Ian SoCAL Fencing Center U 735 < 0
18 Luo, Derren Bay Area Fencing Club U 546 < 0
19 Singh, Shiv Prime Fencing Academy U 673 < 0
20 KHANDAN, MILAN Elite Fencing Club U 679 < 0
21 Stock, Ian Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 531 < 0
22 Cole, Zion South Denver Fencing Academy U 1071 < 0
23 Wang, Jacob Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1341 < 0
24 Liu, Kingston Elite Fencing Club U 608 < 0
25 Lu, David Elite Fencing Club U 962 < 0
26 Kim, Noah Elite Fencing Club U 665 < 0
27 Olson, Jack Piedmont Fencing Team U 1248 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!