2nd Annual BBFC RYC and Y8

Youth 14 Men’s Epee (Y14ME)

Sunday, December 14, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2002 2196 - 1825
5 - 8 1824 2175 - 1661
9 - 16 1431 1666 - 1270
17 - 27 1463 2500 - 964

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Parke, Nathaniel TeamK Fencing C25 2196 1940.73
2 Mosley, Wally TeamK Fencing B25 2081 1825.97
3 Wu, Nathan Swords Fencing Studio E24 1908 1656.94
4 Leung, Dylan Maximum Fencing Club D25 1825 1561.20
5 Yang, Ethan South Denver Fencing Academy D25 2175 1555.12
6 Kim, Evan Battle Born Fencing Club U 1766 1484.34
7 Hua, Nolan Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E25 1696 1437.31
8 Fu, Benjamin Yang Fencing Club U 1661 1389.10
9 Chin Nakazono, Justin Bida Fencing Academy U 1666 1259.21
10 Guo, Jonathan LA International Fencing U 1508 1212.71
11 Zhao, Luke Swords Fencing Studio U 1456 1139.85
12 Croy, Felix German Fencing Academy E25 1613 991.05
13 Kou, Mason Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 1312 971.02
14 Yun, Mason TeamK Fencing U 1296 828.79
15 Szeto, Zachary Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E25 1270 807.25
16 Nolan, Morgan Battle Born Fencing Club U 1324 747.44
17 Miller, Xavier Battle Born Fencing Club U 1210 742.82
18 Lo, Stefan Bayside Fencing Club U 1142 725.29
19 Taverna, Matteo Fortune Fencing U 1404 724.74
20 Yun, Nicholas TeamK Fencing U 1222 673.51
21 Lee, Davidson Battle Born Fencing Club U 1199 617.93
22 Ye, Andrew Bida Fencing Academy U 991 567.78
23 Kou, Logan Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 964 513.24
24 Kong, William Swords Fencing Studio U 1289 480.84
25 Huang, Eason LA International Fencing U 1669 294.50
26 Newsome, Eben Raethan Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
27 Dunford, William South Denver Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!