Phoenix Fencing Academy - Tempe, AZ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KRAVETZ Benjamin (Ben) D. | V V V D | V V V V V | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 2 | THORNE Casey B. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | PACK Tanner | V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 3 | COLLINS Vernon | V V D D | V V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 5 | WILLIAMS Timothy | V D V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 6 | PABLO Jesse | V D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 7 | FESTIN Michael G. | V D D V | V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 8 | HERRON Jonathan | D D D D | V V V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 9 | AJAYI Phil | V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 10 | BRECHTEL James | V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 11 | THOGERSEN Eric J. | D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 12 | MAGNIN Lance | V V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 13 | CONWAY Collin | D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 14 | LIPPMAN Elzy | V D D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 15 | HASEGAWA Noah | D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 16 | XU Wangzitai | D D D D | V V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 17 | HILLARD Jake | V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 18 | SANBORN Dimitri | V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | BIRK Phillip | V D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 20 | HERMANDEZ Fernando | V V V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 21 | STEVENS Jacob | D V D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 22 | BALDWIN Alexander | V D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 23 | SYPES Michael | D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 23 | WALLIS Wyatt | D V D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 25 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 26 | KINGSLEY Daniel A. | V V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 27 | LAURSEN Logan | V D D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | SANKEY Levi | D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 29 | HOUSEHOLDER Kyle | D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 29 | SANKEY Luka | D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 31 | CHERNEK Stephen | V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | NIKOLOV Ruben | D D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 33 | LOPRESTI Austin | D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 34 | CUEVAS Tom | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 35 | ALLRED Byron | D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 35 | WELLING Cohen | D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.