Phoenix Fencing Academy - Tempe, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
2 | REBELLO Derek | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 54% | 14% |
3 | HICHA Paul R. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 49% | 24% |
3 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 2% | |
5 | JOHNSON Kai | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
6 | ENRIGHT Isaac | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
7 | GARCIA Evan | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
8 | POLEYUMPTEWA Connor | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
9 | SILVA Joaquin | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
10 | CHAN Elliott | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
11 | JOHNSON Tre | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% |
12 | COPELAND Jackson | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
13 | KINGSLEY Daniel A. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
14 | SAUCEDO Fernando | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
15 | MADALA Amogh | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
16 | KIM Tae | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
17 | RITCHIE Phillip | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
18 | PARK James | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
19 | VENET Téva | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
20 | BOGENSBERGER Hans | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
21 | FOWLER James A. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
22 | NIKOLOV Ruben | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
22 | RING Dylan | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
24 | WRIGHT Spencer | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
25 | MECUM Brett | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
26 | RAISER George | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
27 | CUEVAS Tom | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.