Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
2 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% |
3 | KIM Rachel | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
3 | MA Emily(Yiming) | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
5 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
6 | SHUM Maya | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
8 | OH Julia | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
9 | VO Bao-Vy | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
10 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
11 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 1% |
12 | HU Kate | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
13 | SUN Emily | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 2% |
14 | HSU Kaylin | 23% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
15 | SINGH Ashni | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
16 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 10% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
18 | LEE Ella | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.