Salle Auriol Seattle RJCC

Cadet Men’s Saber (CDTMS)

Sunday, December 7, 2025 at 10:30 AM

Register

Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1791 1815 - 1741
5 - 8 1730 1844 - 1640
9 - 16 1605 1742 - 1491
17 - 28 1271 1638 - 966

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Holmes, Xavier Salle Auriol Seattle D25 1801 1535.94
2 Liao, Yifong Oregon Fencing Alliance D25 1815 1496.63
3 Guven, Derin PDX Fencing E25 1808 1461.00
4 Zhang, Lucas PDX Fencing D25 1741 1397.22
5 Beck, Mica Salle Auriol Seattle E25 1704 1361.10
6 Moulton, Andrew Washington Fencing Academy E25 1844 1336.31
7 Mitchell-Lu, Hiro Washington Fencing Academy E25 1734 1312.35
8 Aikman, Kai Premier Fencing Academy E25 1640 1262.57
9 Na, Yuchan Zachary Washington Fencing Academy E24 1672 1259.82
10 Coppa, Neal Washington Fencing Academy D25 1742 1227.57
11 Park, Emerson U 1581 1220.94
12 Smith, Etienne PDX Fencing U 1595 1167.94
13 Valentine, Rhys Salle Auriol Seattle E25 1491 1147.95
14 Lowe, Devon Washington Fencing Academy E25 1701 1104.12
15 Xia, Daniel Salle Auriol Seattle E25 1494 1088.50
16 Jang, Seohyeon U 1566 1053.57
17 Liebisch, Milo PDX Fencing E25 1371 962.96
18 Dalela, Neel Washington Fencing Academy U 1638 958.92
19 Nelson, Henry Salle Auriol Seattle U 1447 956.42
20 Johnson, Jack Salle Auriol Seattle E25 1267 828.14
21 Caldwell, Jason PDX Fencing U 1448 713.85
22 Kelleher, Liam PDX Fencing U 1097 568.62
23 Tee, Benjamin PDX Fencing U 1165 547.24
24 Ling, Carson Jr West Coast Fencing Academy U 1392 535.57
25 Kil, Mitchell Salle Auriol Seattle U 1144 501.53
26 Harford, Benjamin Salle Auriol Seattle U 966 191.98
27 Kim Zoller, Jacob PDX Fencing U 1301 < 0
28 Morris, Gray PDX Fencing U 1015 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!