Event Results
Midwest Fencing Conference Individual EventsDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KELBLEY Newt | V V | V V V | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 2 | LEE Isabelle | V V | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 3 | SALINAS Jessica | V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 3 | ZEMEK Kayla | D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 5 | ZENG Brianna | D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 6 | LOVE Brianna | V D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 7 | GUSTAFSON Dillon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | MILLER Nicole Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | NICHOLS-HAZZIEZ Kam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | SINGHAL Reena Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | CARTER Kate Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | HODSON Katrin | D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 13 | RAWSON Geneva Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | KRAMER Sydney Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | FENG Lauren | D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 16 | MCINTYRE Sydney | D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |