Event Results
Midwest Fencing Conference Individual EventsDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DOCTER Samantha | V V V | V V | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 2 | OWENS Celine | V V V | V V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 3 | RASMUSSEN Kate Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | GHALI Anya | V V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 5 | HEATH Katy | V V V | V | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 6 | BURKE Gabriella | V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 7 | HERMAN Sabrina | V D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 8 | GAO Jordan | D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 9 | WOODBY Vivienne | V D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 10 | CATALANO Kaki Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | FLATLEY Rachel | D D V | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 12 | MILLER Frances Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | RENNELLS Tiffany | D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 14 | KIM Minseo | D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 15 | JENKS Ashton Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | LARSEN Zoe | D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |