Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PARK Rowan M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
2 | PRIETO Sofia M. | - | 2% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | |
3 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% | |
3 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
5 | KALOPER Sofia | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
6 | IBEN Claire L. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
7 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
8 | YANG Blanche | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
9 | CHO Taylor S. | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 6% | |
10 | SUH Kailey E. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
11 | DE LA CRUZ Ava | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
12 | DE LA CRUZ Alyssa | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
13 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
14 | YOUNG Audrey S. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
15 | TONG Ophelia | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
16 | HOBSON Leena | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
17 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
18 | FAN Elaine | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
19 | VOHRA Anusha | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
20 | YIN Helen | 7% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
21 | HSIUNG Samantha | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
22 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 13% | 60% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
23 | VENFORD Annetta S. | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
24 | NAM Cassie | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
25 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | PITCHER Katherine "Kacey" | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.