Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
2 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
3 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
3 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
5 | GAMRADT Taylor | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
6 | HWANG Jungmin | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
7 | DANG Elizabeth H. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
8 | DO Leila | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
9 | PEREZ Mariezel | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
10 | HOBSON Ava | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
11 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
12 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
13 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 7% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
14 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
15 | OTEYZA Camille | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
16 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
17 | HU Kate | - | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
18 | SUN Emily | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
19 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
20 | RAO Sonia D. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
21 | VO Bao-Vy | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
22 | LEE Allison | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
23 | KIM Rachel | - | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
24 | ZHONG Aleena | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | CHOI Kailyn | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
28 | WONG Isabella | 11% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.