America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
2 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
3 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
3 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
5 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
6 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
7 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
8 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
9 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
10 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
11 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
12 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
13 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 4% |
14 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 33% |
15 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
16 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
17 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% |
18 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
19 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
20 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
21 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
22 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
23 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
24 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
25 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
26 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
27 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
28 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
29 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
30 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
31 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
32 | DONG Angel | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
33 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
34 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | |
35 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 13% |
36 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
37 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
38 | JOHNSON Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
39 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
40 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | |
41 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
42 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
43 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
44 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
45 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
46 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% | |
46 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
46 | LU Elaine | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
49 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | |
50 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
51 | WU Helen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
52 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
53 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
54 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
55 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
56 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
57 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
58 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | |
59 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
60 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 6% | |
61 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
62 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
63 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
64 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
65 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
66 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
67 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
68 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
69 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
70 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
71 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
72 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
72 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 96% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
74 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
75 | PABIAN Emilia | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
76 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
77 | KRAVCHENKO Mariia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
78 | SENOGLU Irmak | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
79 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
80 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
81 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
81 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
83 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
84 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
85 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
86 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
87 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
88 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
88 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
90 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | - | |
91 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
92 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
93 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
94 | SCHICK Veronica | 100% | 89% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
95 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - |
96 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
97 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
98 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
98 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 86% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
100 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
101 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
102 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
103 | WANG Gloria | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
104 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
105 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
105 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
107 | NICHOLAS Eva | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
108 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
109 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
110 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
111 | TESTROET Aubrey | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
112 | FANG Sophie | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
113 | TREACY Aisling | 100% | 98% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
114 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
115 | ALDERFER Katherine | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
116 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
117 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
118 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
119 | CAO Sophie | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
120 | NIE Chuhan | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
121 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
122 | HU Michelle | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
123 | WILLIAMS Peyton | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
124 | ZHOU Ziling | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
125 | BUSHMAN MaeBelle | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.