America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | HOLMES Katharine (Kat) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 3 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 37% |
| 3 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 13% |
| 5 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 7% |
| 6 | BASSA Francesca A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 7 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 8 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% |
| 9 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 10 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 11 | CEBULA Anne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
| 12 | GRADY Miriam A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% | |
| 13 | TOBY Natalia R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 14 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 15 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 17 | WASHINGTON Isis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 44% |
| 18 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 3% |
| 19 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 20 | LIN Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 28% | |
| 21 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 21% | |
| 22 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 23 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 24 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% |
| 24 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 26 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
| 27 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 29 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
| 30 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | YAMANAKA Mina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 32 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | JOYCE Michaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
| 34 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 45% |
| 35 | HURLEY Kelley A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 49% | |
| 36 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 37 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 38 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 39 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 57% | 15% |
| 41 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 24% |
| 42 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 43 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 44 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 45 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 46 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 47 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 48 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 19% | |
| 49 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 50 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 51 | CHU Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 3% |
| 52 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 53 | NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 54 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 56 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 57 | QI Jarynne Valerie | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 60 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 61 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 62 | MAO Amy | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 63 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | YOU Emily | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | SENYUVA Su | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 66 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | - |
| 67 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 70 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 17% | 2% | |
| 71 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | 3% | |
| 72 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 73 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 74 | BUSH emma | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 75 | REMEZA Alissa | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 76 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 77 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 78 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 79 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 80 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 81 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 82 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 83 | BARG Daniella | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 84 | LU Junyao | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 85 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 86 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 87 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 88 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | WU Amelia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 90 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 92 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 73% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | LEE Scarlett | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 94 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 95 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 95 | FENG ge | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 97 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 98 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 99 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 100 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 101 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 103 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 104 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 105 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 107 | LI Fei | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 108 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 109 | SONG Angela | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 110 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 111 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 112 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 113 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 114 | LEE Olive | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 115 | BOYS Nishta B. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 116 | YOUNG VIVIAN | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 117 | KORKIN Alice | 100% | 87% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 118 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 119 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 120 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.