America's Center Convention Complex - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAI Dong-Ying | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 2 | TYSHCHENKO Andrey | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 3 | CHO Michael | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 30% |
| 3 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | - | - | - | 3% | 97% |
| 5 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% |
| 6 | BENNETT Philippe | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 7 | GRAJALES Nestor L. | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 48% | 14% |
| 8 | BALESTRACCI Chris | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 9 | TANG Julian | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 10 | PHILLIPS Jasper | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | - |
| 11 | FLANAGAN James | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 12 | RITTER Nathan E. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 13 | POWERS Douglas A. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 3% |
| 14 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | FADL Omar | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | VALENTINE Iain | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | EPPLY-SCHMIDT Paul | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 18 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 45% | 39% | 7% |
| 19 | BALBOA Rolando M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% |
| 20 | WILBERT Matt | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 21 | GROSS Stephen R. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
| 22 | LEYLAND John | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% | - |
| 23 | KLEIN Johannes | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 24 | JOHANSON David B. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | ESTELL Oscar M. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 26 | KRAUSS John W. | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 27 | DENMAN Matthew L. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | - |
| 28 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 5% |
| 29 | WU Clarence C. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 31 | TOMASI John | 1% | 11% | 42% | 40% | 6% | - | - |
| 32 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | 18% | 51% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 34 | DARRICAU Henri J. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 35 | BROWN Jason | 1% | 14% | 45% | 35% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% |
| 37 | MCGINTY Eli G. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 38 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | PASHBY Stephen N. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | HILL David E. | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | CARTER Tony | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | 19% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | SAUCEDO Fernando | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | NEWELL Tim | 30% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | CHANG William | 11% | 51% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 47 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | - | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 48 | YOO Terry S. | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | WEIL Brent | 16% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | CUNNIFF Joe | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 59% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | WEMPLE Charles | 71% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | CHAO Pierre | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | KLUCZYNSKI Mike k. | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.