Midwest SYC/RCC

Cadet Men’s Epee (CDTME)

Sunday, February 1, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Canlan Sports Libertyville - Libertyville, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2396 2514 - 2130
5 - 8 2035 2321 - 1890
9 - 16 1775 1900 - 1693
17 - 26 1414 2500 - 965

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Huang, Kenneth Fencing Center Of Chicago A25 2514 2259.71
2 Shousha, Hamza Elite Fencing Academy B25 2483 2227.68
3 Luo, Alexander Wanglei International Fencing Club B25 2456 2191.53
4 Van Riet, Stefan Alliance Fencing Academy D25 2130 1841.71
5 Wychulis, Tristan Red Door Fencing E25 2321 1766.23
6 Bagdonas, Olivier Windy City Fencing-Chicago B25 2023 1743.36
7 Song, Aidan LEO Fencing Club D24 1906 1654.58
8 Yakhnis, Seth New York Fencing Academy D25 1890 1622.03
9 Puthoff, Henry Toronto Fencing Club U 1900 1605.07
10 Qu, RuiTing Elite Fencing Academy D25 1870 1590.96
11 Herdman, Julian Cleveland Fencing Academy - East C25 1762 1491.50
12 Sheydin, Barry New York Fencing Academy D25 1803 1403.43
13 Goodman, Liam Windy City Fencing-Chicago E25 1708 1391.73
14 Sathyan, Dev Alliance Fencing Academy C25 1710 1387.49
15 wang, Eason Toronto Fencing Club D25 1755 1370.73
16 D'Sa, Thomas Peoria Fencing Academy E25 1693 1326.43
17 Shaffer, Tyler Windy City Fencing-Chicago D25 1508 1204.53
18 Klots, Theo Olympia Fencing Center U 1377 978.97
19 Lee, Wilson Center for Blade Arts E25 1348 903.50
20 Slavin, Tamir Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 1235 817.92
21 Hurley, Michael Windy City Fencing-Chicago E25 1421 809.63
22 Crossett, Peter Iowa City Fencing Center U 1355 527.68
23 Chinta, Vivaan Peoria Fencing Academy U 1194 397.89
24 Reynolds Chang, Luke ASER International Fencing Academy U 965 334.75
25 Zhang, Eric Ataba Fencing Club E25 1239 325.59
26 Young, Jack Iowa City Fencing Center E25 2500 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!