San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | OSTER Keegan J. | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 2 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 3 | FALLICK Ozzie | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 3 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | - | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 5 | CHEN Howard | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 6 | WINKLER Lucas G. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 28% |
| 7 | KANG Brandon M. | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 8 | FLORES Peter D. | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | BAILEY Asher | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 10 | LI Joshua L. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 11 | YEARLING Matthew | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 12 | YEARLING Ethan | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.