San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 2 | ADAMS Luke C. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 3 | SHIH William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
| 3 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 5 | SONG Lawrence (Larry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 6 | KONG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 7 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 8 | LOMBARDI Leo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 9 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 10 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
| 11 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
| 12 | FERNANDES Zain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 5% |
| 13 | SHERMAN Marco J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
| 14 | LAI Christopher W. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | BHARATHI Bhrugu S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 16 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | SPEVAK Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 18 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 19 | HALL Harper | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 20 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | DESAI Nalin H. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 22 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 23 | CARTER Lucas M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 24 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 26 | MAO Connor | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 28 | SOOD Kishan S. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 29 | KO Tyler B. | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 32 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | SWEENEY Quinn | 100% | 95% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 67% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 35 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | TAMHANKAR Neil | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.