The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Daniel | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 39% | |
| 2 | WHEELER Nathaniel C. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 3 | BEAM David E. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 3 | RAMANAN Govind | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 5 | MANN Sophia J. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 6 | FALLICK Ozzie | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 7 | XIONG Haojiao | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 8 | LI Yao (Liam) | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 9 | WILDERINK Christopher | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 10 | LI Seth | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 11 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 12 | TAKAHASHI Masaya R. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 13 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | MATHUR Ativ | 5% | 32% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | WANG Michael | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LE Long | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | POFF Kainoa | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 40% | 7% | |
| 18 | JIANG Sherwin | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 14% | |
| 19 | UYANIK Muhammet | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 2% | |
| 20 | ZIEBA Aleksander | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 7% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | LI Li | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | XU James | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 24 | STONE Brad | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | - | - | |
| 25 | MCINTOSH Graham | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.