Chaminade College Preparatory High School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUN Brianna K. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 2 | CHANG Celine A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 3 | PEI Audrey | < 1% | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 3 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 5 | DRYSDALE Lita | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 6 | WANG Angelina | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 7 | MANDAP Svetlanna | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 8 | WALL Sophia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 9 | BROWN Riley | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | SHETTY Nandita | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 11 | TSUI Zoe | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 12 | MOORADIAN Anya | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 13 | DANKO Siena | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | HO Samantha | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 15 | GONG Zixi | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | HITZ Iona | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | TOLBERT-SCHWARTZ Cayley | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | RUVOLO Arwen | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | TEGTMEYER Sophia | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | VILLALTA Olivia | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.