Wang Memorial ROC/RJCC/RYC

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, March 21, 2026 at 2:00 PM

Register

Dallas Market Hall MAIN HALL - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2437 2639 - 2259
5 - 8 2152 2318 - 2022
9 - 16 1853 2181 - 1656
17 - 25 1193 1499 - 1001

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Raj, Jay Space City Fencing Academy B26 2639 2382.41
2 Elkousy, Zain al Din Space City Fencing Academy B25 2524 2265.67
3 Chen, Anson Fencing Institute Of Texas B26 2327 2067.03
4 Clark, Benjamin Space City Fencing Academy B25 2259 2001.49
5 Gordon, William Bay Area Fencing Club C25 2237 1981.21
6 Yuan, Zhihe Space City Fencing Academy C25 2318 1960.93
7 Barrett, Austin Space City Fencing Academy C25 2022 1765.64
8 Nuckles, Caden Space City Fencing Academy C25 2033 1751.86
9 Cheng, Mason Fencing Institute Of Texas C26 1940 1677.27
10 Teh, Tang-Ngu Culver Military Academy C25 1873 1607.26
11 West, Abraham Fairfield Avenue School of Fencing D26 2181 1565.80
12 Warmerdam, Joseph Round Rock Fencing Club, LLC D25 1906 1556.39
13 Popokh, Luca Fencing Institute Of Texas D26 1824 1555.85
14 Jin, Xuechong Daniel Space City Fencing Academy E25 1782 1523.12
15 Tan, Alan Altius Fencing Academy U 1656 1374.50
16 Lee, Ryan Fencing Institute Of Texas U 1662 1344.46
17 Francis, Sebastian Space City Fencing Academy E25 1499 1120.46
18 Chung, Royce Space City Fencing Academy U 1401 1116.16
19 Teoh, Liam Altius Fencing Academy U 1252 945.88
20 Verdejo-Buisson, Nicolas Salle De Long Fencers E25 1335 718.44
21 Lin, Evan Space City Fencing Academy E25 1084 697.78
22 Francis, Maximillian Space City Fencing Academy E25 1104 590.39
23 Tornberg, Winston Space City Fencing Academy U 1004 535.92
24 Patel, Aarav Birmingham Fencing Club U 1057 470.36
25 Fan, Joseph-Junen Round Rock Fencing Club, LLC U 1001 109.64

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!