Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 49% | 28% |
2 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
3 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
3 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
5 | LIN Zhiyin | 1% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
6 | BEALE Zoe M. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% | |
7 | KATZ Anat | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% | |
8 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
9 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
10 | XI Shining | - | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
11 | HURST Kennedy | - | 2% | 22% | 47% | 25% | 4% | |
12 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
13 | NEIBART Fiona | 1% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
14 | TANG Catherine H. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 11% | |
15 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
16 | SATHE Mehek S. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
17 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
18 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
19 | MARSEE Samantha | - | - | 5% | 28% | 48% | 19% | |
20 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
21 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
22 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
23 | SHIH Christina | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
24 | CHEN Xinyan | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
25 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 17% | 2% |
26 | TSAI Anna A. | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | LU Amy | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
28 | REDDY Shreya | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
29 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 15% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
30 | NOVICK Mia J. | - | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - |
31 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
32 | NG Sarah W. | - | 10% | 46% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
33 | RAHIM Alina O. | 5% | 41% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
34 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
35 | KALISOVA Kristyna | 1% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
36 | TUNG Renee | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | KIM Sujin | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
38 | SUN Jialing | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | |
39 | PATEL Riya | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
40 | RANGANATHAN Ruchi | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
41 | LEI Weixuan (Demi) | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
42 | YEN Natalie | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
43 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
44 | BELLANTONI Eva | 72% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
45 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 5% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.