University of Houston - Downtown - Wellness and Success Center - Houston, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MEJIA Matthew D. | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | RUFFNER Blake W. | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 3 | QUINONES Diego A. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | FINNEY Lorenz | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | RAJ Jay | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 6 | STANTON Timothy | V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 7 | LARA Diego | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | ACUNA Gabriel G. | D V D D V V | V V D | 5.5 | 3 | -2.5 |
| 9 | ANDRIC Borna | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 10 | TRUBETSKI David | D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | KIM Adrian | V V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | RAMIREZ David | D V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 13 | CHEZ Nolan | V D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | KIM Brian | D V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | CHEN Leetyan | V V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 16 | JOHNSON Chance | V V D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 17 | GIDDENS James Oliver | V V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 18 | KIM Andy | V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 19 | PIERCE Cody | V D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | D V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | CAPRA Ethan | V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 22 | DAI Christopher | V D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 23 | CLARK Benjamin | D D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 24 | MORRIS Matthew | V D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 25 | BARRETT Austin | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 26 | CHEW Aaron | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 27 | PAVLOVIC Alexander | D V D D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 28 | CREBBS Calvin | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 29 | LEY Diego | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 30 | FARMER Marshal | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 31 | FLYNT Hayden | D D D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 32 | MCCOY Camden | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | POOLE James M. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 34 | CHAN ShingHang | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.