The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Jason Liu and (2) Abdel Salem.

Take Action

Event Preview

Youth 10 Men’s Foil (Y10MF)

Fortune RYC/RJCCSunday, March 15, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Back to tournament Register
Ontario Convention Center · Ontario, CA
63 approved entrants 5 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 2006 2335 - 1811
5 - 8 1718 1765 - 1641
9 - 16 1548 1613 - 1456
17 - 32 1412 1586 - 1220
33 - 63 1030 1368 - 478

Registrations
1 Lyu, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center C25 2335 2068.79
2 Sun, Roy SoCAL Fencing Center E25 2046 1782.43
3 Zhang, William Team Touche Fencing Center U 1832 1576.53
4 Turbat, Travis Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1811 1553.02
5 Raj, Yojith Maximum Fencing Club U 1765 1488.73
6 Sun, Lucas Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1737 1483.31
7 Tikhonov, Aleksandr Bida Fencing Academy U 1727 1459.12
8 Huang, Owen SoCAL Fencing Center U 1641 1385.91
9 Lozano, Koen Alexander LA International Fencing U 1576 1310.84
10 Xu, Daniel SoCAL Fencing Center U 1581 1300.34
11 Ho, Kasper Prime Fencing Academy U 1577 1288.38
12 Leung, Joon Maximum Fencing Club U 1613 1264.98
13 Lin, Evan Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1574 1245.15
14 Lee, Elliot United Fencing Academy U 1530 1218.13
15 Meng, Eric Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1481 1208.07
16 Meng, Andy Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1456 1198.80
17 Park, Jackson Prime Fencing Academy U 1563 1193.14
18 Wu, William SoCAL Fencing Center U 1479 1189.19
19 Chang, Owen Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1472 1153.20
20 Park, Ethan LA International Fencing U 1580 1141.27
21 Yin, Luke SoCAL Fencing Center U 1427 1127.14
22 Zhang, Bryant Maximum Fencing Club U 1422 1118.23
23 Surendra, Nivan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1586 1111.96
24 Li, Mason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1367 1111.36
25 Zeng, Cayden Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1371 1099.13
26 Zhang, Alex SoCAL Fencing Center U 1341 1059.74
27 Bagwell, Theodore SoCAL Fencing Center U 1335 1044.79
28 Tan, Austin Maximum Fencing Club U 1457 991.03
29 Chung, Lucas Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1380 988.85
30 Liu, Jordan Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1370 978.19
31 DONG, YIKUN Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1225 943.45
32 Yuan, Vincent Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1220 874.46
33 Sangani, Niam SoCAL Fencing Center U 1325 872.93
34 Chang, Seoryang SoCAL Fencing Center U 1254 842.55
35 Nacu, Andre SoCAL Fencing Center U 1284 816.67
36 Wu, Kangdi LA International Fencing U 1075 758.15
37 Zhang, Bowen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1325 756.03
38 Lee, Jasper Prime Fencing Academy U 1195 751.64
39 he, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1183 751.45
40 Chang, George Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1164 743.31
41 Lee, Jayden Prime Fencing Academy U 1167 699.59
42 Xie, Chen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1227 699.07
43 Sasomsup, Kaison United Fencing Academy U 1114 696.11
44 Gao, Ethan SoCAL Fencing Center U 1139 661.06
45 Chang, Seobin SoCAL Fencing Center U 1368 633.61
46 Domantay, Dylan LA International Fencing U 1022 617.30
47 Vivas, Greyson SoCAL Fencing Center U 1013 574.86
48 Malpica, Tao Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1084 560.23
49 Oh, Aaron Elite International Fencers Club U 1063 550.79
50 Lu, Nathan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 967 492.20
51 Stock, Ian Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 891 428.95
52 Newman, August Fresno Fencing Club U 1135 391.40
53 Nguyen, Rhys Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1084 353.31
54 Li, Brian S-Class Fencing U 1119 241.93
55 KHANDAN, MILAN Elite Fencing Club U 760 214.80
56 Yetcherla, Aarya Prime Fencing Academy U 887 148.83
57 Shang, Jason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 877 66.87
58 Choy, Hazen Bay Area Fencing Club U 758 < 0
59 Zhou, Osborn LA International Fencing U 732 < 0
60 Tang, Lorenzo S-Class Fencing U 783 < 0
61 Huang, Eden Universal Swords and Fitness U 813 < 0
62 Malakan, Noah Fresno Fencing Club U 633 < 0
63 Zhou, Bryce Swordplay LA U 478 < 0

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.