Fortune RYC/RJCC

Youth 10 Men’s Foil (Y10MF)

Sunday, March 15, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Register

Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1962 2232 - 1801
5 - 8 1690 1758 - 1650
9 - 16 1517 1641 - 1389
17 - 32 1416 1690 - 1207
33 - 63 1095 2500 - 573

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lyu, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center C25 2232 1968.82
2 Sun, Roy SoCAL Fencing Center E25 1997 1728.15
3 Zhang, William Team Touche Fencing Center U 1818 1554.63
4 Turbat, Travis Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1801 1540.26
5 Raj, Yojith Maximum Fencing Club U 1758 1465.50
6 Sun, Lucas Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1684 1427.63
7 Huang, Owen SoCAL Fencing Center U 1650 1393.43
8 Tikhonov, Aleksandr Bida Fencing Academy U 1667 1388.33
9 Lozano, Koen Alexander LA International Fencing U 1579 1310.82
10 Leung, Joon Maximum Fencing Club U 1641 1279.82
11 Xu, Daniel SoCAL Fencing Center U 1544 1234.50
12 Lin, Evan Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1587 1213.49
13 Meng, Eric Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1466 1177.78
14 Ho, Kasper Prime Fencing Academy U 1474 1145.03
15 Yin, Luke SoCAL Fencing Center U 1456 1139.38
16 Li, Mason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1389 1130.78
17 Chang, Owen Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1438 1098.38
18 Meng, Andy Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1363 1097.27
19 Zeng, Cayden Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1379 1089.77
20 Surendra, Nivan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1688 1072.09
21 zhang, alex SoCAL Fencing Center U 1353 1059.50
22 Chung, Lucas Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1479 1042.78
23 Zhang, Bryant Maximum Fencing Club U 1369 1026.13
24 Wu, William SoCAL Fencing Center U 1368 1018.05
25 Bagwell, Theodore SoCAL Fencing Center U 1318 999.86
26 Park, Jackson Prime Fencing Academy U 1517 990.32
27 Lee, Elliot United Fencing Academy U 1340 946.99
28 Yuan, Vincent Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1305 916.19
29 DONG, YIKUN Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1207 913.94
30 Liu, Jordan Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1317 865.55
31 Park, Ethan LA International Fencing U 1532 855.17
32 Chang, Seobin SoCAL Fencing Center U 1690 780.35
33 Wu, Kangdi LA International Fencing U 1091 716.72
34 Sasomsup, Kaison United Fencing Academy U 1240 683.28
35 Sangani, Niam SoCAL Fencing Center U 1294 680.23
36 Ruan, Alexander Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1246 679.62
37 Xie, Chen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1238 662.02
38 Domantay, Dylan LA International Fencing U 1244 659.68
39 Chang, George Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1111 637.48
40 Gao, Ethan SoCAL Fencing Center U 1157 622.30
41 Nacu, Andre SoCAL Fencing Center U 1218 596.55
42 Chang, Seoryang SoCAL Fencing Center U 1137 556.57
43 Oh, Aaron Elite International Fencers Club U 1165 521.02
44 Lee, Jasper Prime Fencing Academy U 1077 513.31
45 Lu, Nathan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1031 462.02
46 Newman, August Fresno Fencing Club U 1194 414.04
47 Nguyen, Rhys Precision Athletics Fencing Club U 1239 409.63
48 Malpica, Tao Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 983 389.20
49 Lee, Jayden Prime Fencing Academy U 1054 388.79
50 Zhang, Bowen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1163 324.79
51 Yetcherla, Aarya Prime Fencing Academy U 1174 284.60
52 he, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 941 263.61
53 Stock, Ian Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 704 146.36
54 Choy, Hazen Bay Area Fencing Club U 973 39.36
55 Vivas, Greyson SoCAL Fencing Center U 727 28.82
56 Chen, Lukie Maximum Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
57 Li, Brian S-Class Fencing U 937 < 0
58 KHANDAN, MILAN Elite Fencing Club U 573 < 0
59 Tang, Lorenzo S-Class Fencing U 914 < 0
60 Zhou, Osborn LA International Fencing U 1192 < 0
61 Huang, Eden Universal Swords and Fitness U 1025 < 0
62 Malakan, Noah Fresno Fencing Club U 675 < 0
63 Shang, Jason Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 716 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!